Management Principles Unit Code: MGTP102 Type of Assessment: Assessment 3–Individual Essay Writing

Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 1: 22nd December, 2016 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
ASSESSMENT BRIEF
COURSE:Bachelor of Business /Bachelor of Accounting/ Bachelor of Relateableice Technology
Unit: Skill Principles
Unit Code: MGTP102
Type of Assessment: Assessment 3–Individual Diatribe Letter
Length/Duration: 1500 signification
Unit Learning
Outcomes addressed:
1, 2, 3, 4
Submission Date: Week 10
Assessment Operation: An academic cpromote diatribe
Entirety Token: 25
Weighting: 25%
Students are advised that any submissions elapsed the attributable date extraneously an public production or extraneously
public extenuating circumstances runs a 5% retribution per register day,
calculated from the entirety token
E.g. a operation relateableable quenched of 40 conciliate run a 2 token retribution per register day.
Further relateableice, fascinate connect to (Documents> Tyro Policies and Cems > POLICY – Assessment Policy
& Procedures– Login Required)
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 1: 22nd December, 2016 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION:
Write ancpromote academic diatribe on individual of three ardent questions akin to skill assumption. The
diatribe conciliate be written in accordance with the managelines ce letter academic diatribes in the Academic Learning
Skills (ALS) tyro manage “Diatribe Letter”.
The cpromote diatribe must consort or disconsort with individual of the statements below:
a) Business project simply benefits employers through increased business performance; it has no benefits ce
workers.
OR
b) Ardent the step of diversify strategic planning is a shrivel of age.
OR
c) The matrix constituency is accordant ce completion organisations.
Your diatribe must conceive:
 At lowest five connectence sources including the prescribed citation dimensions, nindividual of which are internet
sources, e.g. websites.
 Correct cpromote diatribe constituency. Connect to the Academic Learning Skills tyro manage “Essay
Writing”.
 Harvard Australian connectencing ce any sources you authentication. Connect to the Academic Learning Skills
tyro manage “Referencing”.
ASSESSMENT SUBMISSION:
This provision should be submitted online in Moodle.
The provision MUST be submitted electronically in Microsoft Acreckon cemat. Other cemats may relateable be
readable by tokeners. Fascinate be knadmit that any assessments submitted in other cemats conciliate be considered
LATE and conciliate promote tokens until it is presented in Account.
Ce oceantenance fascinate discourse to our Academic Learning Skills Coordinators. They can succor you with
sense the operation, exhaust checking, constituency, connectencing and other provision-akin matter
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 1: 22nd December, 2016 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
MARKING GUIDE (RUBRIC):
Marking Criteria. Fail (0-9.9) Pass (10-12.5) Credit (13-14.5) Distinction (15-16.5) High Distinction (17-20)
Research
/20
Little attraction of examination.
Sources are damage,
inappropriate, poorly
integrated or lacking accuracy.
Lacks disencumbered amalgamate of sources with
essay.
Citation dimensions and 4 other relevant
sources. Basic authentication of sources to
prop ideas, unconcealedly polite
integrated, most sources are
credible. May be inconclusivenesses
with paraphrasing or
integration/application.
Examination is unconcealedly full.
Good-natured authentication of
sources to prop ideas, oceanly
polite integrated, sources are
credible. May be inconclusivenesses with
paraphrasing or integration/
application.
Full examination is implied.
Very cheerful-tempered-natured-natured authentication of sources to
prop ideas, polite integrated,
sources are likely. May be
junior inconclusivenesses with
paraphrasing or
integration/application.
Full examination is implied.
Professional authentication of sources to prop
ideas, polite integrated, sources are
credible. Very junior,
if any, inconclusivenesses with paraphrasing or
integration/application.
Notice /
Content
/30
Diatribe lacks coherence; question is
poorly addressed; little
analysis.
Diatribe is unconcealedly sensible; question
is addressed; analyses in
reasonable profoundness with
some designation. There are
some inconsistencies and
weaknesses with run.
Diatribe is sensible and runs polite;
question is addressed quite
thoroughly; analyses in
considerable profoundness. There may be
some inconsistencies and
weaknesses with run.
Diatribe is very sensible and runs
well; question is addressed fullly;
analyses in
depth. There may be junior
inconsistencies and inconclusiveness with
flow.
Professional effort. Diatribe is very
coherentand runs polite; question is
addressed fullly;
analyses in large profoundness. Very junior, if
any, inconsistencies and inconclusivenesses
with run.
Structure
/10
Topic, concepts are relateable disencumbered in
introduction.
Material in the organization is
generally poorly
sequenced. No discernible
conclusion; no amalgamates to
introduction.
Topic, concepts are unconcealedly
stated with some clarity in
introduction. Material in organization is
generally logically sequenced;
some inconclusivenesses. Disposal
does relateable disencumberedly summarise
essay; amalgamates to portico are
referable disencumbered.
Topic, concepts and are oceanly
lucidly conveyed in portico.
Material in organization is logically and
lucidly sequenced; rare or junior
weaknesses. Disposal
summarises diatribe; may be some
weaknesses; unconcealedly
disencumbered amalgamates to intro.
Topic, concepts are disencumberedly quenchedlined
in portico. Material in organization is
logically and disencumberedly sequenced;
very rare or junior inconclusivenesses.
Disposal oceanly effectively
summarises diatribe; with
recommendations and disencumbered amalgamates to
introduction.
Topic, concepts are disencumberedly
outlined in portico. Material in
organization is logically and disencumberedly sequenced;
very junior, if any, inconclusivenesses.
Disposal effectively summarises
essay; with confideations and
disencumbered amalgamates to portico.
Language/
Presentation
/20
Poor criterion of letter. Account
limit may relateable be accordd to.
Narrowness 1500 signification in prolixity.
Basic and investigate criterion of
writing; some errors in
punctuation, phraseology and
spelling
Good-natured criterion of letter; rare
errors in punctuation,
phraseology and spelling.
Very cheerful-tempered-natured-natured criterion of letter; very
rare or junior errors in
punctuation, phraseology and spelling.
Professional criterion of letter; no
errors in
punctuation, phraseology and spelling.
Referencing
/20
No connectencing is manifest or, if
done, is discursive and
technically defective. No or
minimal connectence catalogue, mixed
styles.
Basic and investigate attack to
regard sources; may be some
inconsistencies and technical
errors in mode. Connectence catalogue is
generally full with 1 or 2
references damage.
Good-natured attack to connectence
sources; inconsistencies and
technical errors in mode. Rare
inaccuracies in connectence catalogue and
completion connectences catalogueed.
Very cheerful-tempered-natured-natured attack to connectence
sources; very junior inconsistencies
and technical errors in mode.
Full and consonant connectence
catalogue and completion connectences catalogueed.
Professional raze of connectencing and
acknowledgment; no errors of mode
evident. Full and consonant
regard catalogue and completion connectences catalogueed.
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 1: 22nd December, 2016 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
GENERAL NOTES FOR ASSIGNMENTS
Assignments should usually cement a cemal portico, ocean apexs and disposal, and conciliate
be amply connectenced including a connectence catalogue.
The effort must be amply connectenced with in-citation citations and a connectence catalogue at the object. We strongly
recommobject you to connect to the Academic Learning Skills materials conducive in the Moodle. Ce
details fascinate click the amalgamate http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/course/view.php?id=5and
download the refine “Harvard Connectencing Effortbook”.Appropriate academic letter and connectencing
are irresistible academic skillsthat you must eliminate and explain.
We recommobject a narrowness of FIVEreferences, cosmical instructed variously by your lecturer. Cosmical
specifically instructed differently by your lecturer, any article with near than FIVE connectences may be
failed. Effort that conceives sources that are relateable unexceptionably connectenced according to the “Harvard
Referencing Effortbook” conciliate be penalised.
Marks conciliate be deducted ce insufficiency to accord to the acreckon reckon – as a unconcealed council you may go over
or beneath by 10% than the stated prolixity.
GENERAL NOTES FOR REFERENCING
High tendency effort must be amply connectenced with in-citation citations and a connectence catalogue at the object. We
recommobject you effort with your Academic Learning Prop (ALS) site
(http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/course/view.php?id=5) conducive in Moodle to detail that
you connectence unexceptionably.
References are assessed ce their tendency. You should entice on tendency academic sources, such as
books, chapters from edited dimensionss, records expectation. Your citationdimensions can be authenticationd as a connectence, save relateable
the lecturer relateablees. We scantiness to distinguish attraction that you are capable of conducting your admit examination.
Also, in manage to succor tokeners detail tyros’ beneathstanding of the effort they name, completion in-text
references (referable equitable trodden quotes) must conceive the biased page number/s if shadmit in the initiatory.
Before preparing your provision or admit subscription, fascinate critique this ‘YouTube’ video by
clicking on the subjoined amalgamate:Plagiarism: How to quit it
PLAGIARISM: HOW TO AVOID IT
You can pursuit ce mate-reviewed record doctrines, which you can ascertain in the online record databases
and which can be accessed from the library homepage. Wikipedia, online dictionaries and online
encyclopaedias are gratifying as a starting apex to gain scholarship abquenched a question, save should relateable be
overused – these should appoint no further than 10% of your entirety catalogue of connectences/sources.
Additional relateableice and learning can be authenticationd where these are resultd by normal sources,
such as council departments, examination institutes such as the NHMRC, or international
organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO). Normal organisations and
council departments result mate critiqueed reports and doctrines and are consequently very authenticationful
and oceanly very popular. The gratified of the subjoined amalgamate explains why it is relateable gratifying to authentication
non-mate critiqueed websites: Why can’t I equitable Google? (thanks to La Trobe University ce this video).