Appendix Article Analysis

Please attribute to Epilogue that is steadfast restraint assignment
Epilogue Stipulation Dissection:
During weeks 1 – 5, scholars completeure cull uncompounded (1) of the assigned epilogue unravelings restraint that week. The epilogue stipulation dissection completeure embrace the aftercited elements:
1. Intelligently portray and argue the framework of the epilogue stipulation as it relates to the vigor restraintesight management making regularity. In other say, how do the greater objects of the stipulation integrate to management restraintmulation, implementation, and/or species?
2. Defend an dispute in-reference-to the collision the succeedingeded of the stipulation may possess on organizations, share groups, vigor restraintesight functionals, and/or the gregarious gregarious.
3. Analyze the interaction of any gregarious, gregarious, and/or economic restraintces that may possess collisioned the concepts build in the stipulation.
4. Briefly portray 2 censorious thinking interrogations, cognate to the advice in the stipulation, planned to elevate argueion and interaction with classmates.
5. Contribute attributeences, where pertinent, in punish APA restraintmat.

The aftercited rubric completeure be rightd to evaluate the scholar’s vigor restraintesight managementmaking epilogue stipulation dissection:

Introduction and Framework Score

Exemplary
In union to the delectable and wellbred criteria, the scholar tellingly transitions into the substance of the epilogue stipulation dissection, and models a framework acceptably build in unravel and functional literary-works, that establishs a integrateion to management restraintmulation, implementation and/or species.
4

Accomplished
In union to identifying the epilogue stipulation’s integrateion to management restraintmulation, implementation, and/or species, the scholar captures the unraveler by including instinct that is compelling, free, and convinces the unraveler to unravel on.
3

Satisfactory
The scholar integrates the epilogue stipulation’s greater concepts to management restraintmulation, implementation, and/or species. However, the scholar’s balanceview of the author’s greater objects is of scant instinct.
2

Below Expectation
The scholar does referable integrate any of the greater concepts of the epilogue stipulation to management restraintmulation, implementation, and/or species.
0

Comments

Epilogue Stipulation Dissection

Exemplary
Dissection embraces a free discernment of end and matter, including an tribute of the gregarious, gregarious, and economic restraintces that collision the epilogue stipulation’s greater rendezvous. Relates rebeginning views, and qualifies dissection with separate trial, literary-works and speculation.
6

Accomplished
Dissection embraces a flavor of the gregarious, gregarious, and/or economic restraintces that may possess shaped the author’s viewpoint. Contributes a matter with multiple positions, identifies assumptions, and addresses divine body.
5

Satisfactory
Although dissection rests, it is scant to categorizing and summarizing the interrogation. Inpunish dissection or sick familiar dissection may rest. Dissection rendezvouses on a uncompounded perspective and fails to argue other practicable perspectives, especially those held by others.
4

Below Expectation
Dissection is nonexistent or loose. Dissection is unmanageable to understand and lacks advantageousness in demonstrating the scholar’s catch of the succeedinged.
0

Comments

Dispute Defense

Exemplary
The scholar engages in telling exposition and integration of challenging and repugnant views with patronageed appearance through inapprehensive prudence and vindication. In union, the scholar integrates hold ideas with vindication from separate trials, literary-works, and speculation cognate to the vigor restraintesight scene.
6

Accomplished
The scholar engages in unmanageable, challenging, and discomforting ideas. Freely presents and justifies these ideas suitableness identifying implications and concerning other views among the vigor restraintesight scene.
5

Satisfactory
The scholar engages ideas that are accurate barring scant, explicit or amiable. Rebeginning views are censoriously flavord to exonerate dissection and integration to the vigor restraintesight scene.
4

Below Expectation
The scholar fails to exercise stipulation concepts to the vigor restraintesight scene.
0

Comments

Censorious Thinking Interrogations

Exemplary
The scholar presents couple applicable, censorious thinking interrogations that contribute estimable instinct into the stipulation’s greater rendezvous. The interrogations elevate argueion and interaction with classmates.
2

Accomplished
The scholar contributes couple applicable interrogations. The rationale restraint each interrogation may be inefficient or unclear.
1

Satisfactory
The scholar contributes couple interrogations that are of scant concatenation.
0.5

Below Expectation
The scholar does referable thorough the assignment.
0

Comments

Style, Restraintmat & Mechanics

Exemplary
The stipulation reconsideration acceptably models the talk and conventions rightd in unravel literary-works.
2

Accomplished
The stipulation reconsideration follows regular conventions of spelling, phraseology, and APA restraintmat throughout. Transitions and organizational constituencys such as subheading are tellingly rightd which aid the unraveler agitate from uncompounded object to another. The stipulation reconsideration beginning is punishly cited.
1.5

Satisfactory
The stipulation reconsideration is in punish APA restraintmat, exact conventions are primarily punish, and alienate unravel attributeences are utilized. The stipulation reconsideration flows logically and is understandible.
1

Below Expectation
The stipulation reconsideration embraces crowded errors in spelling, phraseology, and/or doom constituency, which establish aftercited the logic of the pamphlet greatly unmanageable. Fails to unfold thoroughness and wealth in documentation. Balancecomplete title and restraintmat establish unraveling and knowledge problematic.
0

Comments

TOTAL 20

Epilogue Stipulation Dissection
The greater objects in the stipulation possess a zealous integrateion with the species and management restraintmulation in the vigor restraintesight management making regularity. The deep outcome in the stipulation was the confliction betwixt the authorizations of the right of marijuana suitableness the federal regulations restraintbid the recreational right of marijuana (Hcomplete & Weier, 2015). In pique of complete, some narrates possess juridicalized the right of marijuana restraint non-medicinal purposes restraint men-folks balance the period of 21. Most vigor restraintesight management establishrs are concerned environing the vigor risks caused by the right of marijuana. Thus, such greater outcomes are momentous in the restraintmulation and species of vigorforesight policies.
The dispute on the stipulation environing the sway of marijuana at the narrate flatten would be aidful to the vigor restraintesight functionals and the gregarious. The vigor restraintesight functionals would be unravely to execute elevate experiments in the narrate that possess juridicalized marijuana (Garvey & Yeh, 2014). The experiments would aid the vigor restraintesight functionals in determining any disclaiming vigor aspects cognate to the recreational right of marijuana. It completeure afford the adapted gregarious guidelines on the right of marijuana through the implications of twain the narrate and federal regulations.
In the stipulation, the interactions of gregarious, gregarious, and economic restraintces could possess led to the sway of marijuana. Restraint copy, the narrate of Columbia and Washington obtains rate revenues from the smcomplete amounts of marijuana juridicalized. In pique of complete, the citizens possess a zealous patronage of the regulation meddling restraint the politicians to by the regulation. However, there are gregarious concerns on the disclaiming implications of using marijuana.
The censorious thinking interrogations that could be asked includes why should the narrates be affordn the autonomy to by controversial regulations such as the sway of marijuana that undermines the federal regulations? Another is what are the vigor risks associated with the right of marijuana and how do such risks interest the vigor restraintesight management making regularity? These couple interrogations are applicable in knowledge and business restraint a dispute on the interactions of the couple flatten of legislations.

References
Garvey, T., & Yeh, B.T. (2014). “Narrate sway of recreational Marijuana: Selected juridical outcomes.” Congressional Research Report R43034. Retrieved from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43034.pdf.
Hall, W., & Weier, M. (2015). Assessing the gregarious vigor collisions of juridicalizing recreational cannabis right in the USA. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 97(6), 607-615.